Analysis of results in patients after treatment using various segmental bone alloplasty techniques

Restoration of bone, adjacent joint and surrounding soft tissue integrity is an important factor in achieving full function affected limbs patients with bone tumors. Biological reconstruction has a number advantages over other artificial implants. The aim the work to analyze results clinical approbation segmental alloimplant using by different methods for treatment malignant Material methods. data 17 tumors, secondary lesions or neoplasms long bones aggressive course pathological process were analyzed. All underwent surgery remove en-block tumors replace post-resection defects alloimplants. Different fixing alloimplants sterilization used. Three are presented. Results. analysis surgical who bioreconstructive was performed. functional according MSTS scale complications operations classification Henderson E. et al. assessed. total 58.8 %, among which local wound observed 5.9 % cases (1 patient), atrophic nonunion recipient – 4 (23.5 %), violation metal fixator 2 11.8 infectious recurrence tumor most common amounted 35.3 (6 patients) all cases. Conclusions. Bioreconstructive interventions (using alloimplants) should be used clear indications achieve best results. application developed presented will reduce risk associated alloplasty. recovery lost fastest limb through use structures allows widespread this technique cancer patients.